« January 2006 | Main | March 2006 »

Conservative blasts Bush&Co. as "radicals."

As Salon.com is reporting, in October, Lawrence Wilkerson, the lifelong Republican and miliary man who was Chief of Staff under Sec. of State Colin Powell, has publicly stated that the White House is an anti-democratic "cabal" led by Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. "Those people are not conservatives. I'm a conservative. Those people are radicals," he said at the Univ. of Maryland recently.

As Salon.com summarized, Wilkerson suggested that he and Powell "were duped by the case for war forged inside the Pentagon and CIA under the close watch of Cheney and his top aides," but came forward main because of "the use of American forces to torture prisoners in the war that it launched."

Wilkerson's a retired Army colonel who repeatedly saw heavy combat in Vietnam as a helicopter pilot, attended the elite Airborne and Ranger schools, earned degrees in international relations and national-security studies, taught at the Naval War College, and served as acting director of the Marine Corps War College. As if those credentials didn't make him worth listening to, Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld referred to Wilkerson's claims as "ridiculous"--the ultimate endorsement, to be sure.

Today, Wilkerson continues to see an administration that punishes dissent, pushes a radical reinterpretation of the Constitution, and exploits executive power.... "I can tell you that 9/11 made [Cheney] a paranoid, to the extent where I'm not sure his exercise of power carries with it reason."
.....
[Wilderson] said the administration has played the fear card with lawmakers by suggesting that if the United States gets hit again, it will be their fault unless they back such policies as warrantless spying on Americans and the brutal interrogation of prisoners.

Such interrogation led Wilkerson to cite Aharon Barak, the chief of the Israeli Supreme Court, which ruled against the torture of prisoners in 1999. "This is the destiny of a democracy, as not all means are acceptable to it, and not all practices employed by its enemies are open before it," Barak wrote in the decision. "Although a democracy must often fight with one hand tied behind its back, it nonetheless has the upper hand."

Losing that upper hand, Wilkerson said, "is a very dangerous thing."

al Qaeda's not the IRA, Mr. Bush

Prof. Xavier Raufer, in "Al-Qaeda's New Front"

We are astonished when we see...when we hear, when we read what the present American administration describes as al Qaeda. They describe this as some kind of an Irish Republican Army, except that instead of being Catholics, they are Muslims. This is 1980s terrorism. It's the Red Army Faction. It's the IRA. It's even Abu Nidal group in the Middle East. It has nothing to do with what terrorism is today.... President Bush would disagree with what I am saying, but...we also...totally disagree with him, so it's no surprise. [al Qaeda is] like—it's totally amorphous. It's like an amoeba, you know? New jihadis are entering the fray each day.

And our invasion of Iraq and continued occupation of Iraq reverses this trend how?

Get a clue, George W. Bush. For the republic's sake, get a clue.

Duck! (No, quail.)

Cheney_tshirt

New TypeLists

I've added some new TypeLists, including "I Read," "Evolution," and "Fotoblogs," all of which are in the gray column to the right. Check out the links. (Evolution 101 is particularly good. And make sure you explore the photo archives of rion.nu's great NYC photoblog. For better or worse, she is moving to Paris, so I assume the subject matter of her work will become the City of Lights instead of the The Big Apple.)

['tween] Hillary & Bloomy?

Mike Bloomberg for President . . . as a Democrat?

What about Clinton-Bloomberg '08?

Electoral College-wise, such a ticket makes no sense.

Actually, Bloomberg or Clinton as a presidential candidate, either way, makes little sense in terms of the Electoral College.

But, it's not Electoral College math that should greatly influence the decision as to who the candidate is.

(Consider that Gore lost his own once-fairly-"blue" state, Tennessee, in 2000. And Bush and Cheney both come from securely "red" states, yet relatively early on in the Primary process Bush emerged as the GOP prez pick, and Cheney's state of origin obviously didn't influence Bush's decision much when selecting him as a running mate.)

BJU bans Starbucks

Bob Jones University is apparently switching coffee supplies because Starbuck's supports "homosexual events and causes."

On another note: Tom Vilsack, the Gov. of Iowa, says he supports civil unions (but not "gay marriage"), and wants to see progress for gay rights in Iowa after his tenure.

Hotline's William Beutler Dissembles and Smears Liberal Blogs

Matt Stoller's post on MyDD is a good examination of a smear against "liberal bloggers" by Hotline. The Agonist points to the episode Stoller's blogging about as an aspect of the bigger picture: persistent "mainstream" media attacks on progressive bloggers.

Jive

From Social Design Notes

Nyc_jive_truck

Jews - the 2% solution?

In a grotesque display unbefitting of a governmental or similarly secular body anywhere, the Indiana legislature erupted into the song, "Take A Little Walk With Jesus," at the prompting of a private citizen who had just led the body in prayer, Clarence Brown.

From the Washington Post story:

Brown, 51, is an evangelical Christian layman who works in an auto parts factory 70 miles south of Indianapolis. Invited to give a prayer to open the April 5 House session, Brown said he was thinking about the separation of church and state as he drove to the state Capitol.

He said he talked with God during the ride and decided to speak up for the man he considers his savior. "I wanted to share the word. That's what I'm supposed to do," Brown said. "I have to do what Jesus Christ says for me to do as a witness."

Brown's prayer included thanks to God "for our lord and savior Jesus Christ, who died that we might have the right to come together in love." When the prayer was finished, [Indiana House Speaker Brian] Bosma announced that Brown would "bless us with a song."

Notice that Brown's thinking about the separation of Church and State led him to decide that leading religious worship in the public chambers of a legislative body was right and necessary. Such thinking is a transmittable symptom of a particularly debilitating pox afflicting America today: Christian religious supremacism. It is an insidious bug that's been allowed to spread for at least 30 years, and its architecture consists of:

1. a dominionistic sense of entitlement (a conviction that Christians by virtue of the supreme cosmic lordship of their god, Jesus the Christ, have authority over all things including the natural world and any government), and
2. a revisionist, Christianized American history in which the United States was created to be an officially Christian nation (both its culture and government) by men inspired not by Enlightenment principles emerging from an increasingly secularized and scientific world, but by religious chauvinism.

Fortunately, it's not just viruses that spread, but antigens: the tale of the worshiping legislature came to my attention thanks to a diary by my friend Frederick Clarkson. His diary is entitled "Do Jews Matter?" It was posted here, and it's subject matter is the report of a rabbi concerning his meeting with Indiana House Speaker Brian Bosma on February 14--the Indianapolis JCRC's Jewish Lobby Day. (Clarkson first encountered the rabbi's message here, which led me here, which side-tracked me here, and thus to the Post article.)

The virulence of the above-mentioned religious supremacism is most subtly demonstrated in the words of Bosma as related in the rabbi's account, itself in a proper religious context (i.e. at a religious gathering not on government property!) on the evening of February 17:

    Last Tuesday, the Indianapolis JCRC's Jewish Lobby Day was held.  Around 40 Jews from around the State of Indiana came to Indianapolis to lobby our state senators and representatives on a number of issues.

    The day ended with a private meeting with Speaker of the House Bosma meeting our group in the beautiful House chambers.  We asked questions about full day kindergarten, about the clinics, and a young member of the delegation asked about providing sexuality education in public schools that is more than abstinence based.  He responded to everything we asked.  Sometimes we liked what he said and sometimes we didn't.

      Speaker Bosma wondered why we hadn't discussed the controversy surrounding the issue of prayer in House chambers.  He told us his version of what happened and what he believes, and a passionate exchange took place.  The end of this exchange left us, the Jewish delegation, in shock.  Speaker Bosma, defending the prayer issue, asked, "How many Jews are there in Indiana?  About 2%?  There are at least 80% Christians in Indiana."

      The implication of this statement was that our minority community doesn't and shouldn't have any say or any voice.  It is about the majority and what the majority wants.  The jaws of the delegation dropped to the floor.  We were speechless.  Everything we believed about this country had just been trampled.  Gone was the belief of the constitutional protection of minorities.  Gone was not feeling marginalized.  Gone was the belief we were not strangers in this country.  I am sure that Speaker Bosma is a fine man, but in that moment, for the first time in my life as a citizen of this country, I was scared.  It is what I now call the 2% solution (and Jews are much less than 2% of this state) that if you are only 2% don't even bother to speak up as the "Tyranny of the majority" will prevail.

    I am sorry to bring such a depressing message as we prepare for Shabbat, but it needs to be said and addressed.  I have been reminded about why we need to be vigilant. So I come to you on this Friday, February 17, 2006, to ask you to use this Shabbat to think about joining me and others at times to raise our voices.  We might not agree on all the issues, but we agree that as Jewish residents of this State we should have a voice.  2% or less shouldn't matter.  It is not about the majority.  It is about us.

    As you light your Shabbat candles this evening, light one for this great nation that has allowed us to grow and prosper and worship as Jews without restrictions.  Light the other as beacon to our elected officials who if they follow the light will understand that leadership comes with responsibility to all, to be inclusive of all, and to help those who need the most help.

###

[UPDATE: Speaker Bosma has apologized for his remarks to the JCRC.]

NYC housing crisis worsens

From Gotham Gazette:

The city’s total number of housing units reached 3.3 million in 2005, . . . [but] it is harder for many New Yorkers to afford those homes and apartments. While real income in New York fell by 6.3 percent from 2001 to 2004, the median monthly rent rose by 5.4 percent increase (sic) from 2002 to 2005, the study found. As a result city resident must spend an increasing percentage of their incomes on rent.

An archive of other NYC housing stories from Gotham is here.