Dear President Obama,
I am disgusted by the unethical and self-destructive nature of our nation's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) policy. I am profoundly disappointed by you and your Administration's failure to work to reverse DADT and to allow Americans who merely happen to be gay to serve as soldiers in defense of the republic.
I strongly urge you to pressure the Congress to repeal DADT and by Executive Order to order the military to suspend DADT pending the review of the policy in light of its discriminatory nature and in light of the trend throughout the Western world--from Israel to the United Kingdom, Israel to Uruguay---to permit gay patriots to serve openly in the armed forces of their democracies.
The immorality of the DADT policy is inherent in its name: it requires individuals to lie to their government. DADT perpetuates dangerous discrimination against vital American soldiers and, by extension, all Americans who happen to be gay. What is more, Mr. President, any policy in peacetime or wartime is dysfunctional at best, self-destructive and even psychotic at worst, that would require America's defense to be weakened based on something that is a clear triviality--be it sexual-orientation or anything else. Sexual orientation is a triviality in light of both the professionalism of a soldier and the need his or her skills address.
The case of Lieutenant Dan Choi--a graduate of West Point, an Iraq veteran, and an Arabic linguist, no less--is illustrative. He is exactly the sort of soldier the republic needs, especially now, yet DADT has recently resulted in his dismissal. This is grotesque.
Imagine a military policy of rejecting off the assembly line any armored personnel carrier with a serial number ending in an even number instead of an
odd number. In the final analysis, the logic of such a policy--one resulting in the military willfully denying itself an asset based on a triviality--is as unsound as is the logic of
dismissing a valuable American soldier, such as Lieutenant Choi, based on his or her sexual
orientation.
Additionally, Mr. President, DADT runs contrary to the some of the key values behind the revolutionary political acts of our Founding Fathers. It is important to consider the antiquated and religion-based underpinnings of so much anti-gay bigotry, and to do so in light of the fault our republic's Founders found with religion-based realities like state churches and monarchies by divine right. DADT can be deemed an unenlightened, Levitical stain on the conscience of a liberty-based nation, something more similar to having the theocratic doctrines of the Taliban influence US military policy than the ideals of Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" or Thomas Jefferson's "Notes on Virginia" influence US military policy. Also, a powerful result of considering as conclusive and acting upon any supposedly practicality-based arguments, such as the "unit cohesion" argument, by DADT proponents, will be to sustain discrimination and hate against gay Americans generally and, in particular, to provide comfort to--a sense of validation among--many people whose bigotry against gay Americans is ultimately a religion-based animus.
It is far past time to begin the process of destroying DADT and standing up for civil rights for gay Americans and for commonsensical and not prejudice-based policy-making regarding US military troop recruitment and deployment.
Please reply, Mr. President, with an outline for speedily ending DADT.
Sincerely,
Scott Isebrand