« NJ couple of 15 years gets some respect, a few state benefits | Main | Tell Sen. McCain not to attend this event »


I love the term "non-podders." :)

It's a good question - and one that's getting blurred by NPR's podcasting, too.

I wonder if the problem is not so much that the Internet is impinging on radio that's causing the 'great switchoff' of American radio but that of audience disaffection with the general homogeneity of the content? All-talk stations and all-music stations may have their uses, but I see (other than NPR) few stations with the same diversity of content I see on Radio 4 in particular (but also R2 & R3). Maybe I'm just missing some of them? Then again, they don't advertise. Nowadays, someone with a good podcast feed aggregator can assemble their own personal radio station; but what about the non-podders?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)